How To Find The Real Reason for Conflict Between Two Teams

I am doing an on line management course and the current topic is conflict. I have been given a scenario where there is a company that has historic dislike between marketing and finance teams. The question posed is what you could do to identify the historical conflict/tension amongst the teams? What steps you would take to successfully resolve the tensions/conflicts between the teams and a brief explanation as to the rationale for each step. How would you evaluate the outcomes? I would appreciate some tips as to how to go about this.

The Team Doc Says…

That’s a great business scenario to test how you would resolve a conflict. It is a situation that would really occur in the work environment.

Your first step would be an assessment in the form of interviews with the team members. Your questions for this interview would include things like “How well does the [other] department respond to requests for assistance?” You’ll want to delve into a discussion with the team members to find out the underlying reason for the conflict. Use open-ended questions — who, what, why, how — to get the most information.

Once you’ve found the reason(s), you would detail an action plan for resolving the conflict. It may be as simple as regular communication or it may be complicated such as deep rooted issues between the leaders of the teams.

Like this post?
Then you'll love my Team Building Tips weekly!

Just enter your name and email below and press "Send the Tips!"
NameEmail
About Denise O'Berry

Hello! My name is Denise O’Berry — aka Team Doc. I’ve spent years working with teams and their leadership to help them improve and work through team issues. You see some of that advice in the answers on this website. I’d like to help you too. Connect with me on Google+, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube

Comments

  1. Great information about how to manage conflict in a virtual team

  2. Alun says:

    In the past I have sucessfully used stakeholder mapping to highlight where team interface and where they percieve the business value in the relationships with other teams. Each team visually maps out all the interactions with stakeholders. The map shows the amount / quality of those interactions and the direction of information. They then qualify each relationship based on informed, satisfied or delighted. Maps are shared and the discussion is held as to where teams are under and over delivering based on business benefit and objectives. Action plans fall out based on business benefit. Hey presto!

Speak Your Mind